Hi :)
As far as java goes LibreOffice 3.5.x prefers java 1.7 which hasn't been 
released yet.  So you might need to upgrade your version of java from
http://www.java.com

Your English is fine but there might be a list that does use your preferred 
language.  Here's the page for "de" lists
http://de.libreoffice.org/hilfe-kontakt/mailing-listen/

Regards from
Tom :)  


--- On Sun, 18/3/12, u-ri <[email protected]> wrote:

From: u-ri <[email protected]>
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Indexing a text by concordance file failes
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, 18 March, 2012, 0:41

Hi Tom,

thank you very much for the fast response and the hints.  

Using the concordance file was necessary, because the index is quite big and 
has to be changed several times (prepress, for publishing etc., 300p text and 
two indexes for persons and items).  

Worked with little errors in OO 3.1., so I hoped that it would work even better 
in LO, which I use (since fork) in my daily work.  But now I can't index by 
concordance file at all.  Even a simple test-text and a few entries results in 
a headline and that's it.  Until now I thought indexing by external file would 
be a standard procedure (as a part of the online-help).

New installation of LO didn't change anything. Maybe use of concordance-file 
relies on some feature, I don't know (a special java-environment e.g.?)

Best regards
u-ri

(Sorry about my poor english. I'm not a native speaker at all...)
Win7 64Bit LibreOffice  3.5.1.2 /Writer


--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Indexing-a-text-by-concordance-file-failes-tp3833634p3835571.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to