On 31/03/2012, Andreas Säger <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 30.03.2012 12:28, Tom Davies wrote: >> >> >> --- On Fri, 30/3/12, Ian Lynch<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It seems Microsoft is lobbying the UK Cabinet office for OOXML in place of >> odf >> http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2012/03/microsoft-redeploys-ooxml-in-o.html >> >> Anyone that has a point of view can respond to the consultation at >> http://consultation.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/openstandards/how-to-respond/ >> >> The more that state odf is the choice if we want proper open standards the >> better so please publicise on relevant lists. > > Who cares? OOXML is a standard and I've heard of some compatible > freeware. I think it was named Liber Office or something ... >
Nice irony. :) The consultation document itself was created using LO34, yet classified with the government organisation as a "word template"! This proves the strategic fallacy of using LO as an m$ clone to create m$ documents. As long as users are encouraged to create m$ documents using LO, m$ will remain dominant. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
