krackedpress wrote > > In his blog, Michael Weeks has as a great table comparison between LO > and Apache's OO. > > I would love to see something like this between LO and MSO. > > http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2012-04-26-ooo-comparison.html > <http://people.gnome.org/%7Emichael/blog/2012-04-26-ooo-comparison.html> > Well, most of the points that look good for LibO do not matter, are a matter of taste, may be even counter productive. The OOXML output filters are a desaster. Many people complain about all the bundled stuff (dysfunctional report builder, too many languages). Most of the Calc differences can be seen as draw backs (I prefer OOo Calc actually).
There are plenty of comparisons between LO/OOo and MSO. The result depends on the tester. If you compare LO with MSO the same way as Micheal compares AOO with LO then MSO wins. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/blog-with-great-comparison-table-between-LO-and-AOO-tp3972755p3972842.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
