Hi :)
Great news! :)  Thanks Gary :)  I think a lot of people had kinda given up hope 
of them ever managing to release a new version.  

Btw your 1st link got me a 
"We're sorry, the page you requested was not found."
lol.  Still the 2nd one looked great :)
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)


--- On Fri, 18/5/12, NoOp <[email protected]> wrote:

From: NoOp <[email protected]>
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, 18 May, 2012, 5:02

On 5/17/2012 4:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :) I think the last official release was a 6, possibly the 6u31.
> None of the 7s have made it to full official release.  

You think? Did you not bother to check the links that I provided?

Here's a few more:
<http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/44437>
http://java.com/en/download/index.jsp
"Free Java Download
Download Java for your desktop computer now!
Version 7 Update 4 "


At least 1 of
> them was apparently compromised out-in-the-wild when it reached
> release-candidate status. Regards from Tom :)
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 17/5/12, NoOp <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: NoOp <[email protected]> Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re:
> Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: [email protected] 
> Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 1:32
> 
> On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
>> There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding
>> edge application. Even then you can install a second Java 1.6 and
>> point the
> 
> Java 1.7_0.4 is the current recommended _released_ version of Java. 
> https://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp "Recommended Version 7
> Update 4" <https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/why_upgrade.xml>
> 
> You'll need to go hunting for Java 1.6 now.
> 
> Further: 
> <https://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/> 
> "Support for Java 7 (1.7) added. User can select between Java 6 or 7 
> engine, if both are installed. "
> 
>> office to that installation. In any case it has to be 32 bit
>> because under Windows the office is a 32 bit application.
> 
> Perhaps if you would include some quotation from the post others
> could understand what you are replying to. I see nothing in the OP
> that indicates 'steelej' was using a 64 bit version.
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to