Hi :)I think it's a matter of opinion whether it is a bug or not. I tend to agree with you both but it's difficult to judge without finding out the background to the decision to change. It might be worth posting a bug-report as a feature-request asking for it to be put back the way it was and see what it gets linked to or what happens to it. Regards fromTom :)
--- On Thu, 16/8/12, Andreas Säger <[email protected]> wrote: From: Andreas Säger <[email protected]> Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: scalc 3.6 date format problem To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, 16 August, 2012, 19:57 Am 16.08.2012 19:05, Shaun Devlin wrote: > Version 3.6 of Scalc treats a date entered in the format dd-MMM-yy as > text, not as a date which can be displayed in a user selectable format. > This is not true if the date is entered as mm/dd/yy or yyyy-mm-dd. > > This is a change from 3.5.X and I consider it a bug. > > Shaun Devlin > No, it's considered as a new feature. Another thing that has been fixed without being broken. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
