> On 18/09/2012 at 20:13, Doug <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Note, too, that the old argument, "I bought it, > > so it's mine," will be out the window--if it's rented, it clearly > > is not yours to copy, etc. > > As far as I remember, it was never yours. Most EULAs forbid e.g. > reselling of box copy. They clearly state that they grant you right > to use software, nothing more.
Depends on legislation & jurisdiction in the relevant country. Over here where I currently subsist, Microsofts' "EULA" is afaik essentially illegal and irrelevant. Especially concerning the "reselling interdiction". This has been ruled out in court something like two decades ago or so. The most irrelevant part of Microsoft's EULA is the one that states that if any clause of the EULA is invalidated in court, all other clauses shall still apply. Because it's afaik a very basic principle of jurisdiction over here that if the judge considers any clause of an EULA (or any other contract) as deliberately abusive, then the entire contract is invalid as a whole and the court will establish the rules to apply. I'm not a lawyer, however. I've just read an article written by some lawyer about the subject a long time ago. Sincerely, Wolfgang -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
