Hi :) I really don't mind if people disagree with me or even if it's not that strong, just a possible uncertainty about something i said. The important thing imo is to get enough good answers out there that the op can pick and choose or get inspired by one or more in order to solve the problem and move on. The important bit is getting questions solved.
Blind obediance is what got us into this mess with MS, Adobe, Oracle and the rest in the first place. It's passionately disagreeing with each other that helps us develop good choices. "Diversity breeds serendipity"! If we were all the same it would be really boring! :) Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: Dr. R. O Stapf <[email protected]> >To: anne-ology <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected] >Sent: Monday, 15 October 2012, 3:00 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice in MacWorld Australia > >I did not want to express it that explicitly.... what you wrote is > perfectly right.I am often wondering why some members of this forum >complain so much > about LO instead of exchanging information in > non-inflicting-feelings-of-others words, which help other users to > solve their problems and/or help to move LO's development forward.On >15.10.2012 07:48, anne-ology wrote: >MSFT does not list their bugs; they deny them;-(On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:28 >PM, Dr. R. > O [email protected]:I have my > still my doubts on graphics, but all the other remarks of Tom > I fully agree.By the way is there a list of MSO bugs we can have a >look at? > I doubt!On 14.10.2012 10:39, anne-ology wrote:same here.On Thu, Oct >11, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Tom [email protected]:Hi :)I prefer LO >on Windows even though i have a choice of > MSO 2007 and 2010 onthe same machine.All 3 installed but LO >handles > graphics better.Plus itdoesn't keep changing styles, >languages, indentations, > size ofbullet-points and it keeps track of numbers better in > numbered lists.Alsobetter compatibility.Each version of MSO >stuffs up > documents created bythe other.If i write in LO then save as >doc then > both versions of MSOdisplay the file the same way.I find the >menus > easier although somethings are just as easy on both.Regards >fromTom :)From: Andreas >[email protected]:[email protected]: Thursday, 11 >October 2012, 23:48Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice in > MacWorld AustraliaAm 11.10.2012 20:46, >webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:It is nice to see that MacWorld Australia states > that LibreOffice is a"must have" app/package. I wonder >if the MacWorld > for the USA and Europewould have the same statement.Be >nice to have LO listed in the "must have" > category in the variousWindows magazines. We could use >more Windows > users, and freeadvertisements towards Windows users, as >we can > get.It would be nice to have a booth in a Windows > version of the bigsoftware shows that happen for Linux >and Mac. But > those booths may bevery expensive to "rent" for such an >event.Windows users can run MS Office easily and for > little money (if any).Why should they use LibreOffice if >all they want is > cheap MS Office?Idealism? Masochism? > > > > >-- >For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] >Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > > -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
