Hi :)
Extensions is such an old name.  Anyone any idea if it would be difficult for 
the devs to change the name to Add-ons or Plug-ins or is there a newer word 
that people are using?  Perhaps Apps?

Regards from
Tom :)  





>________________________________
> From: Jay Lozier <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2012, 6:09
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] messages returned
> 
>On 11/24/2012 10:10 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
>> At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
>>> This message COULD be sent in response to my own post, but NOT in response 
>>> to Mr. Davies' post. Now that the message has been posted, it does not 
>>> matter any more, but
>>> somehow I would like to know why ...
>>> 
>>> (2012/11/21 17:53), Tom Davies wrote:
>>>> Have you tried renaming your user profile? Is it possible the problem is 
>>>> being caused by an [Redacted]?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not sure if it would be better to post a new bug-report and link to 
>>>> the old one, or just add a comment to say the regression appears to have 
>>>> reappeared.
>>> 
>>> [Redacted]: I use mainly the same [redacted]s on my home computer and the 
>>> one in my office (would have to check whether there are differences)  Home 
>>> computer works fine. So, likelihood of a bug is not so high - I suspect.
>>> 
>>> Java: checked JRE this morning (had two days off here in Japan).  It was 
>>> installed (1.6.037). Updated to 1.7.0.09 just now.  No change.  LO crashes 
>>> 100% when trying to use File -&gt; Wizard.
>>> 
>>> Any other ideas?
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>> 
>> The original rejection said "Mail appears to be spam [...] and is rejected 
>> due to policy."  Your message contained the word _e x t e n s i o n_ (or its 
>> plural) three times in a little over 120 words.  That's quite a high 
>> concentration.  I hesitate to point this out, but that word is a feature of 
>> certain types of spam.
>> 
>> (My first attempt to send this, without the editing, has - not surprisingly 
>> - also not reached the list.)
>> 
>> Brian Barker
>> 
>> 
>I did not see that. It makes sense some Bayesian filters will check certain 
>words "overuse" based on patterns seen in spam.
>
>-- Jay Lozier
>[email protected]
>
>
>-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
>Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
>
>
>
>
-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to