Hi :)
WoooHooo, C++ is much better and working with the devs in LO means the code can 
be tested more widely than if it was just written as a purely in-house 
Extension.  Hopefully resulting in better code and better support for that code 
for whatever the company needed.  
Regards from
Tom :)  





>________________________________
> From: Stephen Morris <samor...@netspace.net.au>
>To: michael.me...@suse.com 
>Cc: LibreOffice Users <users@global.libreoffice.org>; Kohei Yoshida 
><kyosh...@novell.com> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 20:11
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Development of Extensions for LibreOffice
> 
>On 02/06/2013 04:56 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>> 
>> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:57 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>>       I have Eclipse with the OpenOffice plugin to enable development of
>>> extensions for Libreoffice. Can someone tell where I can get
>>> documentation on the Libreoffice Calc internals and how to interface
>>> specifically to things like the Pivot Table dialogue so that it can be
>>> extended. I want to work around the fact that Pivot Tables in Calc 3.6.5
>>> are functionally not equivalent to Excel 2002 let alone Excel 2010?
>>     Oh - that's bad :-)
>> 
>>>       I was also thinking of developing these extensions in Java, are
>>> there any issues with doing so?
>>     Well - if you develop this in Java then it's unlikely to get into the
>> code code. Also - you'll have a rather grim time trying to get
>> everything you want, and (I suspect) you'll find embedding into
>> arbitrary dialogs is not really easy at all.
>> 
>>     So - I -strongly- recommend just checking out the code, compiling it
>> and poking the developers list for some code pointers to that dialog.
>> 
>>     Adding the features you need to the core, so everyone can enjoy them
>> out of the box is almost certainly the best way to achieve your goals -
>> and (after all) C++ is not so distantly related to Java :-)
>Hi Michael,
>    I have already downloaded to source code and had considered modifying the 
>code directly, but thought and extension might be easier and simpler, but if 
>writing an extension means that it won't be guaranteed of making the product 
>then modifying the code is the better way to go. I haven't looked at C++ in a 
>long time but it shouldn't be that difficult to pick up again, and it should 
>be easy to get the code suite into my Eclipse development environment once I 
>update it for C++. I'm also running out of time for relating Calc's 
>compatibility to Excel 2002 as in April/May the organisation I work for is 
>upgrading to 2010, so I may just have to develop for compatibilty with that. I 
>have 2010 installed on this machine at home, but it is running under Windows 
>and I'll be doing my development work under Linux, and last time I looked 
>Office 2010 doesn't run under Wine nor CrossOver Office.
>
>regards,
>Steve
>
>> 
>>     Does that make sense ?
>> 
>>     Thanks !
>> 
>>         Michael.
>> 
>
>
>-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
>Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
>
>
>
-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to