Hi :) Cool :) Thanks :) So, time to post a bug-report? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
The only advantage with docX is that, like Odt, you can rename the file-ending to zip and then dig out the pictures from the "images" folder. It's a pain to get the images back into the right place but hopefully all this might get smoother in the future. Perhaps install 3.6.3 alongside 4.0.0 or perhaps just stick with the more stable branch for a bit longer and try the 4.0.x a bit later? Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: upscope <upsc...@nwi.net> >To: users@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013, 16:53 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] .docx documents with graphic, not opening >correctly > >On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:45:19 AM Tom Davies wrote: >> Hi :) >> DocX is really bad for sharing with people unless you be be fairly certain >> they are using the same version of MS Office on the same version of >> Windows. >> >> The older MS format, Doc for 97/2000/Xp/2003 is still currently the best >> format for sharing files. >> >> Odt is becoming more widely used but the only version of MS Office that can >> really handle it is MS Office 2013. The 2007 and 2010 attempt to implement >> Odf was a bit sub-optimal. Regards from >> Tom :) >> >> >________________________________ >> > >> > From: e-letter <inp...@gmail.com> >> > >> >To: upscope <upsc...@nwi.net> >> >Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org >> >Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013, 10:14 >> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] .docx documents with graphic, not opening >> >correctly> >> >On 19/02/2013, upscope <upsc...@nwi.net> wrote: >> >> Both of the above LO versions have the problem. I can open a .docx >> >> document >> >> if >> >> it is all text with no problems. If the document like a new letter I get >> >> in >> >> >> >> .docx format is opened the graphics are missing, or partically there or >> >> off >> >> >> >> set from where they should be. >> > >> >Tell the source to re-send in odt format, or use google docs to view. >> > >> >> I even created a new user and logged in as him, then using SUSE version >> >> of >> >> LO4.0.0.3 tried the same document with the same results. Also I just took >> >> a >> >> >> >> copy of a news letter I am getting ready to send out ( generated in .odf >> >> format) and saved it as a .docx document. the formating was totally >> >> messed >> >> up >> >> and graphics were messed up also (graphics in wrong place, text in wrong >> >> place >> >> probably caused by graphics being wrong, some graphics just plain blank >> >> box,> >> >Good. You should be sending the newsletter in odt format; most modern >> >software can view it, otherwise pdf/html should be used. >yes I am aware of compatibility problems. Typical MS. > >What I am trying to do is open the .docx document, and then save it as odt. >This works fine is original doc is all text. But when graphics exist in >document and get relocated, missed etc, then its hard to get a proper >document. It seems to work better in LO 3.6.3 than in LO 4.0.0.3. > >Thanks >-- >openSUSE 12.2(Linux 3.4.28-2.20-desktop x86_64)|KDE 4.10.00 >"release 546"|Intel core2duo 2.5 MHZ,|8GB DDR3|GeForce >8400GS(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-304.60) > > -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
