Hi :) +1 Go straight to html and miss out the intermediate step of using MS formats.
If they really insist on you using an MS format and then convert that into html rather than just going straight to html then Doc without the X is the best bet but i can't see why they would want that. It would be interesting to hear what happens when you give them the html. Do they really need that middle step?! Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: James Knott <[email protected]> >To: LibreOffice <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 11:13 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Filtered html document > >Thomas Blasejewicz wrote: >> Good evening everybody > >It's morning. ;-) >> I am trying to make something available through Kindle. >> For some reason Amazon recommends preparing the original document as >> ".doc" or ".docx" file >> and in a final step: >> save as -> "Filtered html document" >> (in order to remove MS office codes) >> >> What would be the "equivalent" for saving a file in LO when I, as it >> happens to be the case, do not like working with Word? >> And would that option produce the results Amazon is looking for? > >Have you tried saving in HTML? It's one of the formats that you can >choose from. > > >-- >For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] >Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > > -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
