On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:50 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:11:06 +0100 > Brian Barker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Brian, > > >labels. So the interesting paradox is that the one message to which > >the label was not added was your present one! > > What paradox? The OP wrote it as part of the subject. The list > processing software is smart enough to detect that and didn't prep-end > it as a result. I'm no fan of subject tagging(1) myself, but I use an > MUA that can filter such tags out so I'm not, usually, aware of them. > > (1) List-Id is a far better header to filter on, since using the > subject tag _can_ result in private mails being organised in list > folders if the sender doesn't remove the tag. > > -- > Regards _ > / ) "The blindingly obvious is > / _)rad never immediately apparent" > Well well well, you just can't tell > My Michelle - Guns 'N' Roses >
I have six other major mailing lists that do not tag the subject line. I find there is enough information for me as a reader about which mailing list. Evolution has enough information from the sender to sort into proper message folders. I had hoped this tagging was a feature I could turn on or off. I will see how I might make a RFE. -- Regards Bill Fedora 16, Gnome 3.2.1 Evo.3.2.3, Emacs 23.3.1 -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
