Hi Kracked,

That's what I'm doing.   I have 55 chapters in separate odt files and
use a master document (odm) to join them together, add a table of
contents and a cover page.  While I can't call LO's speed on some of the
individual chapter files blindingly fast, especially on the lager ones
with lots of graphics, it's fast enough.   The combined result is the
issue.

David



On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 15:18 -0400, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> I know that a professional writer of sci-fi and fantasy 
> novels/paper-backs makes each chapter of his books a separate file, and 
> he usually have 15 to 25 chapters.
> 
> I too have never heard of making a document more than 50 to 100 pages 
> per file.  Just paging through it would be slow, even on my mid-range 
> quad desktop with 4 GB of RAM.  To be honest, you might really find it 
> better to break the document up by sections of no more than 50 pages or 
> so, if possible.  I know there must be a way to define the starting page 
> number for each chapter, or do the sectional page numbering in the 
> footer - i.e. Section VII Page 35
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2013 02:30 PM, Girvin Herr wrote:
> > David,
> > That may or may not be true.  I am not familiar with the "free", etc. 
> > tools you mention, but they may be reporting system free memory, while 
> > the LO settings are limits for LO and may be topping out while there 
> > is still free system memory available.  I would take a look at the 
> > document file size and maybe triple that or more for the LO settings.  
> > Keep in mind that the file is compressed, so you should at least 
> > double that size, assuming a nominal 50% compression.  You could count 
> > the number of graphics in your document to get the max number of 
> > graphics setting.  1600 pages is a lot.  I have many "large" documents 
> > but I don't think any of them are 1600 pages.  Maybe hundreds of pages 
> > at the most. So I don't have any experience with a document that 
> > large.  Too bad LO doesn't have a memory pool usage dialog where one 
> > could see the memory usage.  Hint, hint to the devs.  With such a 
> > tool, we wouldn't need to be guessing about these settings.  I suggest 
> > you try File -> Properties and select the "General" tab.  There is a 
> > report on the document "Size" there.  Use the "Statistics" tab to see 
> > some other allocations, such as number of graphics.  Use of this data 
> > may help you zero in on acceptable memory allocation settings.
> > Hope this helps.
> > Girvin Herr
> >
> >
> > On 04/12/2013 09:08 AM, David Ronis wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the reply.  In short, I'd already upped the memory options
> >> for graphics (250MB total, 10MB per object, 100 objects) and tools like
> >> free etc. show that I'm nowhere close to using all my memory (with or
> >> without swapping enabled).
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 22:04 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> >>> Have you attempted anything in particular to see if it allows for a
> >>> speed improvement? For example:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 1. Check on memory usage. How high is it? Are you running out of 
> >>> memory?
> >>>
> >>> 2. Change graphics settings:
> >>>
> >>> Tools > Options > LibreOffice > Memory
> >>>
> >>> Then try increasing the memory for things such as graphics objects and
> >>> number of objects?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 04/11/2013 01:59 PM, David Ronis wrote:
> >>>> Hi Girvin,
> >>>>
> >>>> Most of the graphics in the document are PDF pages that I've imported
> >>>> into Draw and then cut and pasted them into an odt file, which in turn
> >>>> is incorporated into the full document as laid out in the odm file.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also normal scrolling of the odm document is horrendously slow as well
> >>>> (minutes to scroll to the next page and redraw).
> >>>>
> >>>> David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Girvin Herr <girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net>
> >>>> To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Printing speed is glacial for large
> >>>> file
> >>>> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:21:16 -0700
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/10/2013 03:13 PM, David Ronis wrote:
> >>>>> I have a project managed by an odm file that ends up being ca 1600 
> >>>>> pages
> >>>>> long and contains several OLE objects, many graphics (some comprising
> >>>>> entire pages that started out as PDFs).  I find LO unbelievably slow
> >>>>> (even on such simple things as refreshing the window after remapping
> >>>>> it).  I've turned of recording/displaying changes,  upped the 
> >>>>> graphics
> >>>>> cache numbers, set the swap directory to a ram disk, and turned 
> >>>>> off all
> >>>>> to-disk swapping; nothing helps.   This is on a 2 CPU machine with 
> >>>>> gig's
> >>>>> of ram.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm currently trying  to print the project to a file (postscript
> >>>>> format).  This takes 4-6 hours, with 1 of the CPU's running at 
> >>>>> 100% [BTW
> >>>>> is LO multi-threaded?].  The resulting postscript file is big, (about
> >>>>> 350M) but not that big.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm on a Slackware Linux box.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any suggestions?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> David
> >>>>>
> >>>> David,
> >>>> There is a known problem with LO and Encapsulated PostScript (EPS)
> >>>> graphics.  They slow down video rendering tremendously, causing
> >>>> frustrating long scrolling time.  This may also cause a problem with
> >>>> printing, I never tried it.  When I converted my document's EPS images
> >>>> to JPEG, LO rendering/scrolling sped up tremendously.
> >>>> Hope this helps.
> >>>> (Fellow Slacker.)
> >>>> Girvin Herr
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> Andrew Pitonyak
> >>> My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
> >>> Info:  http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> 
> 

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to