As far as I can gather, neither OASIS nor the ODF Technical Committee require a reference implementation, so none has been named. I don't know about the ISO standard, but I would assume this applies there too.
That said, OO.o/LO would be considered by most as the reference implementation. As a "reference implementation", there generally isn't going to be more than one (otherwise, which one would you refer to when they differed?). However, here is a list of software implementing the format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument_software As a side note, the competing MS format also doesn't have a reference implementation. The only implementation that I am aware of is MSO, which, being proprietary, cannot be a reference, as nobody (other than MSO themselves) can see the code. And it has much bigger problems than just a lack of a reference implementation. Paul On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:52:20 +0700 "Urmas" <[email protected]> wrote: > "Paul": > > Don't worry, you can safely ignore Urmas, he's a known troll around > these parts; > > You're welcome to name a full reference implementation of ODF format > not using the OO.o/Staroffice code. > > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
