On 11/28/2013 07:06 PM, Pedro wrote:
> Hi Tom
> 
> 
> Tom wrote
>> 2.  The format stays the same between different versions of the
>> program.  It is the same format used "natively" by many other programs
>> such as IBM Lotus Symphony, Google-docs, K.Office, Calligra and
>> others.  Even MS Office 2013, and more recent, can open and use the
>> format which is an ISO format.
> 
> Actually this is not true. The file extension is the same but the format has
> been changing (that is why you have options to save to ODF 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and
> 1.2 Extended)
> If you try to open an ODF 1.2 Extended file more complex than simple text
> with any other of those programs (even with some older versions of
> LibreOffice) you will find some incompatibilities...
> 
> So, I agree with most of your points but this argument is shooting yourself
> on the foot. ODF does share that problem with MS XML files: same extension,
> different file structure.
> 
> The advantage is that you can always get the latest LibreOffice version for
> free (unlike MS Office...)
> 
> Cheers,
> Pedro
> 

If you save your file in .doc 1997~2000 (or 1997~2003) every program will be
able to open it. Never use .docx.

--doug

-- 
Blessed are the peacemakers..for they shall be shot at from both sides.
--A.M.Greeley

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to