Hi :)
It's not so much that i "wait for it".  I keep meaning to try out the
earlier releases releases in a branch, preferably beta pre-releases of
the x.x.0.  DOingf so and running through a few bug-reports to see if
they still happen in the newer version.  It's likely to help the devs
stabilise the branch earlier.   It might catch their attention at a
time when almost all eyes are on 1 version and maybe help them crack
long-running issues.  I just rarely get around to it and suddenly find
the stable release is already upon us.

It's on my colleagues machines that i really need to ensure that only
the most stable versions are installed and i usually skip a few
branches before bothering to upgrade theirs at all.
Regards from
Tom :)

On 17 December 2013 22:01, Girvin Herr <[email protected]> wrote:
> To add my 2-cents to this discussion, I align with Tom and the others who
> wait for the x.x.4+ version.  In my case, 3.6.7.2 does everything I need it
> to do and does it without surprises. Therefore, I am not pressured to
> upgrade to the 4.0 or 4.1 version. I, and others it would seem, are content
> to wait for the most stable versions.  I have that luxury.  On the other
> hand, others may need to upgrade to get new features they need or think they
> need.  That may be why some install the latest and greatest not-quite-stable
> versions in hopes that the bugs in them will not affect them. Sometimes it
> works, sometimes it doesn't.
> Girvin Herr
>
>
>
> On 12/17/2013 02:17 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
>>
>> Hi :)
>> It sounds like you are happier with much later releases in a branch.
>> It makes sense to wait for the x.x.5.  For a lot of people the x.x.4
>> is the best balance between new features and stability.  If you
>> normally use more than 1 machine then getting a x.x.0 on one and
>> keeping the other at the last stable one you were happy with makes a
>> lot of sense.  It's good to test-drive early releases and post
>> bug-reports against them but to have the stable one for normal use.
>> Regards from
>> Tom :)
>>
>> On 17 December 2013 09:57, rost52 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hint with 4.0.6. This version is indeed very stable and it
>>> has a least one feature which I missed in previous version. Thus I
>>> currently
>>> very happy with 4.0.6.
>>>
>>> I used 4.0.5 before, changed to 4.1.3.2 and then back to 4.0.6. Maybe Tom
>>> is
>>> write and something happend during the download/installation of 4.1.3.2
>>> and
>>> thus this version showed a few bugs of which one I could not accept.
>>>
>>> Currently I am thinking about installing 4.1.4 but maybe I don't have
>>> time
>>> for installation and then 4.1.5 will be released.....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2013-12-17 05:47, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you want to try 4.0.6 first, since you jumped from 3.6.x, it might be
>>>> a
>>>> good idea.  It is at the end on that line and I use it all of the time.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, you can try 4.1.4 when it comes out, but 4.0.6 is very stable and
>>>> you can use it as a stepping stone to the 4.1.x line. The "messages"
>>>> about
>>>> 4.1.3 being too "buggy" for you [or others] suggests going to 4.0.6 and
>>>> not
>>>> going back down to the 3.6.x line.  Later, when all of the "possible
>>>> problems" with 4.1.4 comes in, you can decide if it is ready for you to
>>>> use.
>>>>
>>>> Still, personally, I would try 4.0.6, for now.  Then look into 4.1.4 or
>>>> 4.1.5 later.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/16/2013 06:47 AM, Dr. R. O. Stapf - the service institute japan
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tom,Thanks for the hint, I will do with the 4.1.4 version which is
>>>>>         scheduled to be released this week.RPresidentthe service
>>>>> institute
>>>>> japan... the service enhancement companywww.tsij.org
>>>>> On 2013-12-14 00:46, Tom Davies wrote:
>>>>> Hi :)
>>>>> Ahh, i think just go for a standard normal reinstall of 4.1.3. maybe
>>>>> re-download the installer to make sure that isn't the problem
>>>>> Regards from
>>>>> Tom :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13 December 2013 02:42, [email protected]:The fact
>>>>> that I had to downgrade from 4.2.3.2 to 4.0.6 due to bugs and
>>>>> Nino's proposal to install 2 versions parallel made my thinking that it
>>>>> would be very efficient to have the install wiazerd modify to use it to
>>>>> replace a version or install it parallel to an existing one.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am just hesitant to go trough the work of installing LibO through the
>>>>> command line.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my case I would install 4.0.6 (stable) and 4.1.3.2 (with some nasty
>>>>> bugs
>>>>> for me but some interesting features as well). With 2 versions I also
>>>>> could
>>>>> do easy testing for bug reports.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there interest/support for having the installed wizard modified to
>>>>> enable
>>>>> parallel installations?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-12-12 23:07, Nino Novak wrote:Am 12.12.2013 09:38, schrieb
>>>>> Kunwar
>>>>> Shivpal Singh:What would happen if I download LO 3.5.7 (already started
>>>>> it
>>>>> from Source
>>>>> Forge. Will there be a clash between the 2 versions? Will LO 4.1.3.2
>>>>> allow me to install the older version LO 3.5.7?Kunwar, if it is of
>>>>> interest for you: you can install both versions in
>>>>> parallel -
>>>>> seehttps://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallelRegards,
>>>>> Nino--
>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail
>>>>>
>>>>> to:[email protected]?http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/Posting
>>>>> guidelines + more:http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NetiquetteList
>>>>> archive:http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/All messages
>>>>> sent
>>>>> to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>>>>> deleted
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
>>> Problems?
>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>>> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>>> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>>> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>>> deleted
>>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted
>

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to