Thank you for your advise. 

Yes, I'll guess I'll have to do that, redefine the ranges to (a little more
then) the needed range, then it should probably work. I just wish I had
tested this sooner. 

And the reason why I wanted to do this is simple; when you have a sheet like
this: the easiest way to insert new data 'C'  inbetween column B and D is
inserting a new column rather then cut-pasting everything to the right - and
usually the savest way, but not this time. 
And I'd named the entire rows because when you have more then one screen of
data, it is the easiest way to just click the row header (A) and define the
name in the Name-box on the left top. 
None of the tutorials I used warned against the problem that when inserting,
it would drop the (unused) excells allright, but not move the formula along. 

ABDEF
ABDEF
ABDEF
ABDEF
ABDEF





--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Sum-of-sub-section-Calc-named-row-column-error-bug-feature-or-wrongfull-implementation-tp4103196p4103447.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to