On Thursday 22 May 2014 11:32:03 AM Hedley Finger wrote: > Bruce:Explain to the folks how FrameMaker's management of anchored > graphics does it better, and could be well emulated by the OOo > varieties. In fact, FM's xref formats, index entry formats, ToC, > LoF, LoT formats and much more should be implemented in > OOo's.Regards,Hedley
Hedley: Cross-references are improved by using autotext to create some building blocks, although they're still not as good as in FrameMaker. ToCs and the like are clumsy but tolerable when you get to know them, although organized differently from FrameMaker's. But the anchored graphics -- there, I miss FrameMaker something fierce. I don't know what's so hard about the concept that an anchor is supposed to keep a graphic where you put it. -- Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time) blog: https://brucebyfield.wordpress.com website: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield/ -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
