Florian Reisinger wrote > Hi,The problem we have: We do not have one release branch as Firefox has, > we have two... Users should use and find bugs on the "Fresh" version in > order to make thee fresh, which will be renamed to stable after 6M.So how > to say "you can use the feature packed fresh"? It is not an RC it is an > tested final release....So yes, we have a different model, so we need > different names then the standard :)
Two suggestions:1. Do not use misrepresentation through soft or ambiguous language <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTzZaev8bmM> in order to deliberately misdirect users to download the unstable branch. This is NOT how to garner good will. Use plain simple language like Debian's: Testing, Unstable, Stable, Old Stable.2. Instead of trying to misdirect people to the Unstable version, *make it easy for people to use both the unstable and the stable version AT THE SAME TIME*. Right now your Unstable base consists of two groups: the Willing and those that have been Misled into using it.Normal end users might be willing to use the Unstable branch if they KNEW they could just click on the Stable branch icon and work in that if something crashed and they needed to get work done. Read that: time constraints. Regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4124000.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
