On 10/3/2014 12:25 PM, Tanstaafl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/2/2014 3:11 PM, V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Charles S. (aka Tanstaafl) was given instructions
>> and has agreed to do what needs to be done and review the corrected function
>> for his use case with a current build of  master (4.4.0alpha0+)--and respond
>> in the  fdo#76565
>> <https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76565>   BZ issue
>> regards the UX regression.

> Fix confirmed (had some spare time this morning)...
> 
> It was also mentioned in the bug that it would be back-ported to 4.3

Also, I'm confused...

Jan-Marek in the bug comment on August 17th - well before the 'Hard code
freeze' on September 1st for 4.3.2 (released on Sept 22nd - said that
the patch would show up in the daily builds after that.

So, I'm not complaining, I'm just asking - can someone who understands
the dev process explain why this fix did not make it into 4.3.2?

Thanks

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to