Am 01.11.2014 um 10:07 schrieb Alex Thurgood:
> Le 31/10/2014 21:12, Andreas Säger a écrit :
> 
>> Huh? Really? Which issue number was that? I can't believe that any LO
>> version had been released with such a show stopper issue.
>>
> 
> Well, please reconsider your statement in light of the requirement for
> LibreOffice 4.3.3 on OSX Yosemite and current master 440 alpha to use an
> end of life Apple Java 6, in addition to Java 1.8, to remain even
> remotely stable with the default bundled extensions that require Java.
> 
> The Java 1.8 invocation problem is Oracle's bug (known, slated for fix
> in Java 9), and the fact that on OSX LibreOffice bundles extensions
> requiring Java is the LibreOffice projects responsibility.
> 
> FWIW :
> 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74877
> 
> 
> Alex
> 

Thank you. Just like  Florian Reisinger I was unaware of this issue with
OSX.

Let me rewrite the 3 answers since I still don't know  Tanstaafl's
operating system.

1. Always use a 32 bit JRE with LO on Windows. It may be your second or
third JRE which is perfectly OK. Nothing wrong with many JREs for
different purposes.
2. Mac users need an outdated Java 6 in addition to their default JRE
until Oracle fixed a bug.
3. Use whatever JRE comes from the distributor of your Linux platform.




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to