mhenriday wrote > 2014-12-11 20:34 GMT+01:00 edo1 < > edagro12@
> >: >> >> On a Win_x86 machine on my LAN I'm asked to update LO ver 4.3.1, which I >> did >> to 4.3.4.1. But on a Win_x64 machine running ver 4.2.6-secfix, LO says >> it's >> up to date. >> >> So I'm confused. Which is the latest version? Should I update the secfix >> version even though LO isn't asking for one? >> > > If I understand matters aright, edo1 - and someone is sure to correct me > otherwise - > LibreOffice updates *within* > > each series. Thus 4.3.1 will update to 4.3.4.1, but r.2.6 will not jump > to > the 4.3 series.... > > As to whether you should update the latter to the former, after comparing > the two on your two respective machines, which do you prefer working with > ?... Thanks for your reply, I believe you're correct. As it turns out, just *asking* the secfix version to update renders it unopenable. I just deleted it and installed a fresh ver. 4.3.4.1. Hope I'm now back on the main fork. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-vers-4-2-6-3-vs-4-3-4-1-tp4132307p4132327.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
