Good idea, I should really start using different signatures for different things. I'll probably need a "signature" manager just like a password manager to help me keep track of all those signatures!
On 11/09/2015, steveedmonds [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] <ml-node+s969070n4160008...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > > In some respects your signature was safer on a piece of paper in the > filing cabinet. > I have a different signature I use on electronic documents, not the same > as the one at the bank or the lawyer. > It's still me signing it (statement of CE conformity, drawings, etc.) > but no one can get my money with it. > steve > > On 11/09/15 7:46 am, avamk wrote: >> That's true!! I guess it doesn't really matter how I try to secure the >> document if the receiver will see it on their screen, oh well. Thank >> you for the reminder! >> >> Encryption is helpful though to ensure that at least only my intended >> recipient will see the file. >> >> On 10/09/2015, steveedmonds [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] >> <ml-node+s969070n4159969...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-11 03:06, avamk wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I think this is a rather outdated procedure, but I've come across cases >>>> where I am required to include a scanned image of my handwritten >>>> signature >>>> in a word processing document to "sign" it. Just to be clear, I am not >>>> talking about signing with a certificate, but rather an image of a >>>> handwritten signature inserted into the document. >>>> >>>> I am always scared of doing this, because what if an adversarial entity >>>> gets >>>> ahold of the document and starts using my signature for nefarious >>>> purposes??? So, is there a way to make this document (say, a .odt or >>>> .docx >>>> file) more secure that problem won't happen? Ideally I'd like to >>>> minimise >>>> complications/troubles when the receiver opens the file. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>> Anyone who can view the document can take a screen snap (clip) of your >>> signature image and use it as they like. The security issue is more >>> likely uncontrollable at the receivers end. >>> Are you suggesting something like a pass phrase required to open and >>> view a document, you can do this by just encrypting the file and >>> emailing with something like Enigmail. >>> Steve >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Strategies-for-securing-a-document-with-an-embedded-picture-of-signature-tp4159938p4159970.html >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Strategies-for-securing-a-document-with-an-embedded-picture-of-signature-tp4159938p4160008.html > > To unsubscribe from Strategies for securing a document with an embedded > picture of signature, visit > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4159938&code=YXZrYXBsbWt0QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0MTU5OTM4fC02MzM5MDA3MDg= -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Strategies-for-securing-a-document-with-an-embedded-picture-of-signature-tp4159938p4160012.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
