Op 28-02-17 om 19:08 schreef Bruce Byfield:
On February 28, 2017 10:51:53 AM V Stuart Foote wrote:
Several, but at its core PS Type 1 fonts have been on borrowed time
since TrueType and OpenType were implemented.
The same argument could be used of TrueType fonts.
Users should have replaced or converted their fonts.
Why should they, when support for them remains?
Of note, due to
lack of PS Type 1 support in DirectWrite/Direct2D layout Microsoft
dropped Type 1 font use from Office 2013.
What about GIMP, Krita, Inkscape, and other free software, all of which
still support Type 1 fonts? These are applications that LibreOffice
users are likely to interact with.
Yes, Type 1 fonts are no longer state of the art. However, they remain
usable, and, if nothing else, are important for legacy documents. Many
designers have invested substantially in Type 1 fonts over the years,
and this decision leaves them stranded.
That said, anyone affected by this decision might be interested in the
chart of free font equivalents for proprietary fonts that I drew up
about a year ago:
http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/Free-equivalents-for-standard-proprietary-fonts
Any additions to this table would be welcome.
STIXGeneral is a very good alternative for Classical Garamond
Andre
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
