A simple experiment shows that LO writer considers a new word to have begun when any character occurs after a whitespace character. Do you disagree with this algorithm? I certainly don't. It's straightforward, easy to understand and unambiguous.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:36 PM Dave Howorth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:57:55 +0100 > Krunose <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > is it ok for LO to find five words in 'This is < a word.' as > > I'd have thought the answer was either 4 or 6 depending on whether you > ignore '<' or pronounce 'less than'. :) > > > https://www.countofwords.com/ > > > > finds only four. Don't know how that reflects on this like 'This is 4 > > words' and not sur so on. It's hard to anticipate every possible > > variant > > - is that the reason? > > > > Is there more information about this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kruno > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] > Problems? > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
