James Gladden <[email protected]> writes: > The scheduler picked stf.q@compute-1-1 which was the unloaded node, instead of > "packing" the job into one of the four available slots on compute-1-12 as was > desired and expected. I should add that stf.q@compute-1-1 is the lowest > sequence number instance in stf.q, so this looks like the job was assigned by > sequence number rather than by our "-slots" load formula.
Well, what's the queue_sort_method? However, as I said, there's a bug, but it happens univa just fixed it -- see commits from a couple of days ago, I think. > Any suggestions? I have poked around in the archive without finding the error > of my ways. BTW, why the (-) inversion in the load formula? don't you want to favour more loaded nodes? _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
