Am 30.10.2012 um 13:24 schrieb Lukas: > Hi Reuti, > Thank you for the schedd_job_info true tipp! I'll investigate that. > Afaic we have no unused slots. Also I did some experiments with > reservation and could not see a difference (means: also enabled > reservation for the single slot jobs).
For me the difference was: - Submit parallel jobs with no reservation, and you get a correct functional scheduling. - In case parallel jobs reserve slots, they are reserved but for the user, who is right now not eligible to start a job, hence they are idling. -- Reuti > Best, > Lukas > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Reuti <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 29.10.2012 um 09:37 schrieb Lukas: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Reuti <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The granted slots are taken into account. I think it's a side effect of >>>> the reservation. You submit the parallel jobs with "-R y"? >>> Depend who is submitting jobs but usually people use reservation. >>> What I forgot to mention, is that we use gridengine 6.2u6. In our >>> case, the slots seem to be not taken into account. >> >> This is a paid version and so I would suggest to complain at Oracle to fix >> it. When I look at the scheduler output in 6.2u5 ("schedd_job_info true"), >> it seems that some slots are unsed due to the reservation of the upcoming >> parallel jobs (and so are empty for some time). The uneven distribution is a >> side effect of this I think. >> >> -- Reuti > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
