Reuti <[email protected]> writes: >> Two question here: >> 1.-) if set to false, the usage is not used but the measured? > > During execution of the job you can see it in `qstat -j <job_id>`, but in > `qacct -j <job_id>` the reserved one is recorded.
I think the qstat usage is treated the same way; I documented that after checking. [I recently modified qacct to print the resource request too.] >> 2.-) It talks about "reserved resources", but -l talks about >> "requested" resources. So, do I have to force users to reserver >> requested resources? > > Two words for the same. While it was most likely a clear statement in > the past, with the introduction the advance reservation it could be > misleading. But changing the name of the settings to read > "*_REQUESTED_*" could make former cluster configurations invalid. You > could even argue it should be "*_GRANTED_*". I'd have said they're not the same generally. The reserved granted resources are a subset of the requested ones. Even an h_vmem request, say, could be soft. (This is relevant for resource reservation as well as advance reservation.) -- Community Grid Engine: http://arc.liv.ac.uk/SGE/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
