On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:42:37 +0100 Reuti Reuti wrote: > Hi, Hi Reuti, [...] > Correct. There is nothing in SGE to control this. > > > There was the project Gold: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06346.html > > and William integrated it into SGE IIRC. I on my own saw: > > http://gridengine.org/pipermail/users/2011-February/000141.html
Gold!! I took a look at it when I used Torque/MAUI but I don't remember why we refused to use it ... I'll take a look and ask in mailing list (still active!!). > and never investigated it further (as for your own solution: > prohibiting the submission might not be the proper action (personal > opinion or course) as the already submitted jobs might need less CPU > time than requested and others could be run too). > > BTW: who will pay for e.g. reserved but not used cores for a parallel > job (in case no small job for backfilling is available) could be > another question. Yes, there are many situations that we must take in mind... but as a first approach I chose the simplest solution: if the project used more than X time, jobs submitted requesting that project should be rejected, and queued jobs must be change to hold status. > NB: Manual for Gold can now be found here: > http://docs.adaptivecomputing.com/ => Archived Documentation > > -- Reuti > > PS: RFE could be a job-start-verifier to check constraints at a later > point in time Sorry, Reuti, what is RFE? Many thanks for your help! Cheers, Arnau _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
