An exclusive host consumable is the right way to approach the problem. If
the task elements might be part of a parallel environment, then you'll want
to set the scaling to JOB as well.

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:39:03PM +0100, Tina Friedrich wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm sure this has been asked time and time before, only I can't find
> it (search foo failling, somehow).
> 
> What's the best way to run an array job so that each task ends up on
> a different node (but they run concurrently)? I don't mind other
> jobs running on the nodes at the time, but only want one of mine
> (network IO intensive tasks, best use of file system would be lots
> of them but spread as far and wide as the can).
> 
> I've thought about introducing a consumable - apart from there's no
> node-level consumables at the moment - but am unsure whether that's
> the best way to handle this?

-- 
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@gridengine.org
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to