Oh ... and you can also mix the functional with the fairshare policy ...
Fritz
Fritz Ferstl schrieb:
I'm always interested ;-) - hence I'm still involved after more than
20 years ...
As I wrote, I'd look into the functional policy.
Or if you are using fairshare, as Chris writes, then you might be able
to mix this through the weighting with the -p prio to get something
similar to what you want.
Cheers,
Fritz
Mark Dixon schrieb:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Fritz Ferstl wrote:
Nah, the weight_priority won't help. It just determines how much
influence the -p has vs things like job wait time or urgency. If you
have none of those then all being equal it would have the same
effect as if you left it untouched. And if you have influence from
waiting time or urgency or others then setting the prio weight low
would make it just totally insignificant.
...
Great: Fritz is interested!
How would you do it? :)
Mark
--
UnivaFritz Ferstl | CTO and Business Development, EMEA
Univa Corporation <http://www.univa.com/> | The Data Center
Optimization Company
E-Mail: [email protected] | Mobile: +49.170.819.7390
Where Grid Engine lives
--
UnivaFritz Ferstl | CTO and Business Development, EMEA
Univa Corporation <http://www.univa.com/> | The Data Center Optimization
Company
E-Mail: [email protected] | Mobile: +49.170.819.7390
Where Grid Engine lives
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
