On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:57:17AM +0000, Yuri Burmachenko wrote: > Anyone? > > > > Maybe its meant 1024*GBs? Given that the accounting man page says the relevant figure is recorded in units of GBs that sounds like a likely explanation. To be sure I'd check the job's entry in the accouting file to see what value is present and whether you get the number you expect.
Probably worth a bug report. Should really display as TBs PBs etc I guess. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@gridengine.org https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
