Re: Sql cacheConnection/withTransaction always closes connection

[J. David Beutel]

On 2015-12-09 22:22 , Alexander Holand Salgado wrote:

Thanks for confirming my suspicion. Yes, nested withTransaction would 
not provide the results you might first think you'd get and should 
probably not be allowed. But, I'm still thinking that its worth 
looking at supporting nesting withTransaction within a cacheConnection 
as this should be fine - but that might be something for the dev 
mailinglist.(?) 

Alternately, Grails manages connections and nested transactions (using 
Spring), but that's on a higher level than groovy.sql.Sql.

Cheers,
11011011