It is enough for step one. I already had problems with it (discovered some bugs in the type checker...), but it should be ok. We need to make sure we have delegated properties too (aka, that extension methods work if you define get/set methods). It doesn't solve the issue of IDE support, though :(
2016-05-23 16:43 GMT+02:00 Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org>: > On 23.05.2016 16:35, Cédric Champeau wrote: > >> Yes, "local" extension methods are a very powerful tool. For example >> extensions that are scoped to a class (and optionally its sub-classes). >> Static discoverability is important. >> > > but assuming we had that... what would be missing? Why is @DelegatesTo not > enough for static builder for example? > > bye Jochen >
