Why do you need something "more concise"? It seems pretty OK to me...
On 18 July 2017 at 15:00, Guy Matz <guym...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right! This is what I'm trying to do, but in a more concise way . . . any
> thoughts anyone?
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:43 PM, J. David Beutel <l...@getsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> I guess OP wants to do:
>>
>> if (!doSomething()) {
>> return false
>> }
