Hi Jochen,
As you said, it is actually union overloads. Fully supporting union type
is a big task. So I did not propose union type defination etc. for the time
being ;)Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-About-the-Union-Type-for-method-constructor-declaration-tp5742265p5742274.html Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
