Yes, we have spoken about providing named arguments as a language feature before. It doesn't rule out the need for other options though. I have put some comments in the issue.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Nathan Harvey <nathanwhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > MG's approach is the one I favor, although I am not sure I like using = in > the calling syntax; the colon makes more sense to me. Small detail, though. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html >
