I just checked, and none of the child issues to the Groovy 3.0 umbrella
issue (https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-188050) seems to have
any votes. I find that not surprising: As a developer that uses Groovy
in place of Java to develop a larger framework using IntelliJ IDE, I can
only use a Groovy feature once it has gotten proper IntelliJ support. I
can toy around with it before that, of course, but to e.g. to finally be
able to get rid of using the new-keyword in my project, IntelliJ support
is tantamount. Other new features will be useful in different ways,
other again I will have to check out further, to find where I can use
them best. That makes a meaningful pioritization hard - in the end I
myself would just upvote every child issue...
Others may see this differently of course, but I need support for all
features, as fast as possible ;-)
To prioritize, I would just do the ones that are quicker to do first.
(Or once you have create the technicl child issues in the way you need
them structured, you can ask people to vote between 2 or 3 issues here /
the Groovy Slack... (unless Paul/Jochen/Guillaume/... object, of course).)
It would be interesting to learn a little bit about the effort that goes
into certain features, btw,
Cheers,
mg
On 01.06.2018 23:51, mg wrote:
Hi Daniil,
I am a bit confused here: For Groovy 3.0 someone created a similar
issue, people voted on it to show that Groovy 3.0 feature support was
important to them, you created a handful of child issues, and
everything seemed well & fine :-)
How is this different then ?
Cheers,
mg
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Daniil Ovchinnikov <daniil.ovchinni...@jetbrains.com>
Datum: 01.06.18 22:42 (GMT+01:00)
An: users@groovy.apache.org
Betreff: Re: IntelliJ: Full Groovy 2.5.0 Support
Hi mg,
First of all thank you for caring.
I just want to let you know that such abstract tickets have almost
zero meaning other than serving as a parent for other smaller tasks.
It would be much more helpful to prioritize if you create a ticket for
some particular feature and let others vote for it.
—
Daniil Ovchinnikov
JetBrains
On 1 Jun 2018, at 21:09, MG <mg...@arscreat.com
<mailto:mg...@arscreat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I have created a Jetbrains issue you can vote on for IntelliJ to
fully support Groovy 2.5 as soon as possible :-)
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-193168
Cheers,
mg
