As it turns out, I haven't tried the indy artifacts/compilation switches as yet, just the "classic/standard" jars. I'd suspect though that most benefit would occur if targeting the GraalVM specifically when generating bytecode.
Cheers, Paul. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:42 PM Winnebeck, Jason < jason.winneb...@windstream.com> wrote: > It’s interesting that it is slower, because I thought the point of it was > to improve performance, especially regarding escape analysis and > invokedynamic instruction? They’ve been publishing some very interesting > benchmarks. The AOT mode is very interesting, too, especially if someone > wanted to make some CLI commands in Groovy, although the resulting > executables are still very large if you just wanted to make some shell > “scripts” in Groovy. Though, I would suspect its AOT mode is not very > compatible with Groovy due to extensive use of reflection. > > > > Jason > > > > *From:* Paul King [mailto:pa...@asert.com.au] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2018 4:30 AM > *To:* users@groovy.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: GraalVM/Truffle ? > > > > Running numerous scripts on GraalVM worked fine for me and was only > slightly slower in my tests than the standard Oracle JVM. I haven't done > extensive testing though. > > > > As for actually leveraging any special GraalVM capabilities, I am not > aware of any completed work/concrete plans to date. > > > > As for licensing, it may or may not be an issue. We'll have to see how > things progress before we can say. > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:33 AM MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > > Since GraalVM (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GraalVM > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FGraalVM&data=02%7C01%7CJason.Winnebeck%40windstream.com%7Ce67a260963094d72ed7008d5d1d10f35%7C2567b4c1b0ed40f5aee358d7c5f3e2b2%7C1%7C0%7C636645618198046382&sdata=oRUQ9fKzVaQXVOfwFCvleWQIbsWWWh1uIoSuaJCOfaI%3D&reserved=0>) > was mentioned here > recently: Do we have any statement on plans of Groovy with regards to > GraalVM, including Truffle ? It might be good to have an official > statement here on the main Groovy page and on Wikipedia > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Groovy > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FApache_Groovy&data=02%7C01%7CJason.Winnebeck%40windstream.com%7Ce67a260963094d72ed7008d5d1d10f35%7C2567b4c1b0ed40f5aee358d7c5f3e2b2%7C1%7C0%7C636645618198056394&sdata=THXlJXbqPZTA5td46Ore5UcoH9eTVnDkChajzmUCego%3D&reserved=0>), > even if it e.g., in > essence, just states "Groovy runs/will run fine on GraalVM", "The > Truffle license (GPL 2.0 w CP exception) is not compatible with Apache > Groovy" or "Truffle makes no sense for Groovy (at this point)"... > > Cheers, > mg > > This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original > message and any attachments. >
