I'll move this to the dev list. On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:26 PM Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote:
> > > Am 27.09.2018 um 01:24 schrieb Paul King: > > The String check for "groovy.transform.Immutable" would work fine if the > > 2.4 compiled class was actually loaded with it;s annotations but > > AnnotationCollector changes any meta-annotation to no longer be an > > annotation but a class to store the serialized information for the > > pre-compiled case. > > Was that already in 2.4 the case for @Immutable? I thought it was not > expressed by the annotation collector back then. > > And why do we do all those checks for if the type is annotated with > @Immutable then? We also check for if the annotation starts with > groovy.transform.Immutable, which would cover ImmutableBase as well, > which imho stays on the class... wait...it is source only.. oh.. > > > I think we need to perhaps adjust what we do there > > slightly to leave the original annotation intact. I'll try to work on > > that on the plane trip home - perhaps we should delay 2.5.3 a few days > > to see if we can address this but any alternative suggestions welcome. > > leaving the original annotation in tact is what I suggested to you > before even writing here, because somehow I knew this was the problem, > without even having looked at it properly ;) > > Still I'd like to really understand it, and I am not there yet. > > bye Jochen >
