Am 08.01.2019 um 11:54 schrieb Paul King:
> (4) While sponsorship is below what we'd like and below what it
> at some previous points in Groovy life, it isn't 0. We have several
> existing sponsors, e.g. OCI. The wording about the collective
> that into consideration.
Yep. OCI is a great company for Groovy! We always appreciate its
Let's imagine that would be really great if more people
developing Groovy, more big features(e.g. MOP2, async/await) are
and hard issues(e.g. generics of STC) are fixed every year :-)
Totally agree with you, just suggesting the wording used is sensitive
to existing players. I can help craft wording if needed.
Might be worth thinking about whether existing sponsors would consider
giving their donation through the same channel ? Could have different
tiers of sponsorship (gold, silver, etc), with respective logo sizes,
etc to differentiate. Would lead to a greater exposure for them...
I guess it would also not be too hard to integrate a sponsor names or
logos into e.g. Groovy console (if Apache allows that)...