We are using Clover - it is open source now. We have found it works much better for us at Mutual of Omaha than JaCoCo or Cobertura.
Scott Hickey Mutual of Omaha On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:02 PM Sean LeBlanc <sean.lebl...@icd-tech.com> wrote: > What are people using currently to get accurate code coverage from > new(ish) versions of Groovy? We are on 2.4.10 and I see similar issues as > what this thread is talking about: > > > > https://github.com/cobertura/cobertura/issues/184 > > > > > > > > Does anyone have good experiences with getting more accurate code coverage > numbers with Groovy > 2.0.8? And what route did you take? >
