Jochen Theodorou to Anton Shepelev:

> > Jochen Theodorou:
> >
> > > Frankly... for years we have been defending this
> > > position, but now, with so much distance I actually
> > > really wonder why we keep this.
> >
> > Perhaps it would have helped if you had documented not
> > only language features but also their rationale
> > (justification), at least is difficult, debatable cases.
>
> the reason is easy: it reflects the implementation. But
> the implementation can be changed

The implementation reflects the implementation? I do not
understand.

> > In another reply, Maarten Boekhold refers to section 3.4
> > (Variables) of the "Program structure" document, which
> > has the following to say about assignments to undeclared
> > (or undefined?) variables:
> >
> >    if the variable is undeclared, it goes into the
> >    script binding. The binding is visible from the
> >    methods, and is especially important if you use a
> >    script to interact with an application and need to
> >    share data between the script and the application.
>
> I think you should read the whole chapter 3
> http://groovy-lang.org/structure.html#_scripts_versus_classes
> Otherwise you miss out on some of the concepts and I think
> this passage alone then makes much less sense. On the
> other hand Maarten really explain most of that already in
> his mail

I have read that chapter, and the passage makes perfect
sense. Even normal procedural programming is emulated using
OOP techniques.  Among other things, that chapter says:

   You can also mix methods and code.

Whereas methods are also code, I believe it would be much
clearer if it said "immediate code" -- code that is executed
immediately rather than compiled into a callable method.

> > The explanation is OK, but I failed to look into that
> > document. Do you think you can provide better
> > documentation at a better place? If so, I should
> > certainly appreciate it.  I also thank Maarten for
> > reply.
>
> A better place? What was wrong?

I am not sure, but we both failed to find that paragraph
until Maarten pointed it out. But now that I think about it
again, it is the right place.

Reply via email to