Maybe merging interface with trait could be possible in the future, but
would using the "trait" keyword instead of "interface" have any negative
effects in your scenario ?
I only use trait where I need the added functionality, but technically
it behaves just like a suped up interface afaiaao...
Cheers,
mg
On 05/01/2021 17:14, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Hi Paul,
wouldn't it be possible to implement the default parameter now with
default methods?
On 05.01.21 05:39, Paul King wrote:
You could potentially use a trait?
trait MyTrait {
abstract myFunction(String parameter1 = "1234")
}
class MyClass implements MyTrait {
def myFunction(String parameter1) {
parameter1.reverse()
}
}
assert new MyClass().myFunction() == '4321'
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:22 PM Saravanan Palanichamy <chava...@gmail.com
<mailto:chava...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello
Are there plans to support default parameters in interface methods
interface MyClass {
def myFunction(String parameter1 = "1234")
}
the error I get is Cannot specify default value for method parameter
inside an interface
regards
Saravanan
