One should be careful about those nested its where explicit Closure
parameters are used:
response.data.each { it.children.each { it.children.each {
// scope X here
it.children.each { grower ->
println ...
// it.children.each { farm -> ... 'it' comes from scope X
grower.children.each { farm -> // ok
println ...
// it.children.each { field -> ... 'it' is still from scope X
farm.children.each { field -> // ok
println ...
}
}
}
}}}
Cheers,
Dinko
On 15 June 2015 at 07:19, David Clark <plotinussm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try something like this:
>
> response.data.each {
> it.children.each {
> it.children.each {
> it.children.each { grower -> println([grower.type,
> grower.profile_id, grower.name <http://it.name>, grower.created,
> grower.modified, "", ""].join("|"))
> it.children.each { farm -> println([farm.type, farm.farm_id,
> farm.name <http://it.name>, farm.created, farm.modified, grower.profile_id,
> ""].join("|"))
> it.children.each { field -> println([field.type,
> field.field_id, field.name <http://it.name>, field.created, field.modified,
> grower.profile_id, farm.farm_id].join("|")) } } } } } }
>
> Moving the brackets is optional, it just hurts my eyes to see all of those
> dangling angle brackets each on a line by itself.
>
>
> On 06/14/2015 11:45 PM, Kurt Andrews wrote:
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to pass an extra parameter to the closure
> that's being passed to each in the following code
>
> response.data.each {
> it.children.each {
> it.children.each {
> it.children.each { // growers println([it.type, it.profile_id,
> it.name, it.created, it.modified, "", ""].join("|"))
> it.children.each { // farms println([it.type, it.farm_id,
> it.name, it.created, it.modified, grower.profile_id, ""].join("|"))
> it.children.each { // fields println([it.type,
> it.field_id, it.name, it.created, it.modified, grower.profile_id,
> farm.farm_id].join("|"))
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> I'm trying to pass the grower profile_id down to the farms and the
> fields and pass the farms farm_id down to fields. Is there a simple way
> to do this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt
>
>
>
