Can you confirm the link you are using? Also which browser/os are you using? 
The link you gave in your earlier message looks okay to me.

Cheers, Paul.

On 7/07/2015 10:09 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
Here are the last two parts (one of which is a header):


        Named and named ordinal parameters

Several of the methods in this class (ones which have a String-based sql query 
and params in a List

= Eric MacAdie

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net 
<mailto:pascalschumac...@gmx.net>> wrote:

    Hi Eric,

    thanks for the info. :)

    Which sentence are you referencing to?

    Cheers,
    Pascal


    Am 06.07.2015 um 04:45 schrieb Eric MacAdie:
    Also, the javadoc for groovy.sql.Sql seems to be cutoff midsentence:
    http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/gapi/groovy/sql/Sql.html

    = Eric MacAdie


    On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Duncan Dickinson <m...@duncan.dickinson.name 
<mailto:m...@duncan.dickinson.name>> wrote:

        Hi All,

        I noticed that the "Working with a relational database" section of the 
documentation is empty: 
<http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/documentation/databases.html>http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/documentation/databases.html
 . However there does appear to be doco in 
<https://github.com/groovy/groovy-core/blob/master/subprojects/groovy-sql/src/spec/doc/sql-userguide.adoc>https://github.com/groovy/groovy-core/blob/master/subprojects/groovy-sql/src/spec/doc/sql-userguide.adoc
 - is this something just awaiting the next website refresh?

        I was thinking that I could add to the documentation so read up on 
Peter L's how-to blog post. It all looks straight forward but I'm keen not to 
start something that's already being worked on - hence this email to check 
status.

        Lastly, there doesn't appear to be a process around co-ordinating documentation 
aside from people tagging the document they're working on. I was wondering if the Jira 
"Documentation" component* couldn't be used to a greater extent. Essentially 
we'd likely have 2 types of tickets - a bug for errors/typos/etc and a task for 
new/modifying doco. Perhaps a Lead for the component may also be useful.

        This would mean that people could allocate themsleves a ticket and keep 
it updated to let people know that it's actively being worked on.

        Lastly, I assume that the Apache 2 licence covers the documentation...

        * 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY/component/12326646/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:component-summary-panel

        Cheers,

        Duncan






---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Reply via email to