I haven't used that annotation personally (so somebody that knows better can correct me if I'm wrong here), but I think it is. If you look at the implementations of org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.memoize.MemoizeCache (org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.memoize.UnlimitedConcurrentCache and org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.memoize.LRUCache), they both use synchronized collections for their caches.
If I'm understanding this correctly, should we maybe mention the fact @Memoized is thread-safe in its Javadoc? -Keegan On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:39 AM, David Clark <plotinussm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Quick question. Is the cache that the Memoized AST creates thread safe? >
