Thank you, blackdrag. I always can count on you.
Cheers.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote:
> you miss nothing. This is a logic I wanted to get rid of before Groovy 1.0
> already, but was said to be needed for some special constructs back then.
> And now you cannot easily remove it. But the static compiler does not
> support it, because in the longterm we want to get rid of it
>
> bye blackdrag
>
>
> Am 01.09.2015 08:02, schrieb Edinson E. Padrón Urdaneta:
>
>> Hi, everyone.
>>
>> I'm trying to understand why the following asserts hold
>>
>> // Method
>> def m(def x) { x }
>> assert m() == null
>>
>> // Closure
>> def c = { def x -> x }
>> assert c() == null
>>
>> // Constructor
>> class Klass {
>> String msg
>>
>> Klass(def x) {
>> this.msg = "$x should be null"
>> }
>> }
>> assert (new Klass()).msg == 'null should be null'
>>
>> The arity of the method/closure/constructor is one but I can call it
>> without any argument at all. What I'm missing?
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>
>
> --
> Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
> blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
>
>
