I rather like this behavior/feature, which I'm familiar with from Python
<http://stackoverflow.com/a/16138864>.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Edinson E. Padrón Urdaneta <
edinson.padron.urdan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >What behaviour do you expect of the else block if an exception exception
> >in the try block is thrown, which is not catched and if a finally block
> >is present? Example:
> >
> >> try {
> >> m1() //throws MyException
> >> } catch (SomeExceptionThatWillNotBeThrown e) {
> >> } else {
> >> m2()
> >> } finally {
> >> m3()
> >> }
> >
> >So is this supposed to do m1();m3() then? In other words apiece of code
> >executed only if he try block throws no exception at all?
>
> Hi, Jochen. That's right, *m2()* would not be executed because the
> exception threw wasn't catch and the normal java/groovy behavior of
> executing *m3()* and passing the exception threw inside the try block to
> the 'next higger context' would happen.
>
