On 29 September 2015 at 09:58, Cédric Champeau
<cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This looks like a bug. Would be interesting to look at the bytecode to check
> what method is called for x[n].
Curiously, I tried to do just that in the Groovy AST Browser and, for
the following piece of code:
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
def foo() {
[].withDefault(1)
}
got this:
Unable to produce AST for this phase due to earlier compilation error:
startup failed:
script1443513793544.groovy: 3: [Static type checking] - Cannot find
matching method java.util.List#withDefault(int). Please check if the
declared type is right and if the method exists.
@ line 3, column 5.
[].withDefault(1)
^
That's Groovy 2.4.4
Cheers,
Dinko
>
> 2015-09-29 9:54 GMT+02:00 Søren Berg Glasius <soe...@glasius.dk>:
>>
>> Hi Fellows,
>>
>> I stumbled upon this today.
>>
>> This code runs:
>>
>> class Test {
>> private List<Integer> x = [].withDefault { 0 }
>> Integer getValue(int n) {
>> return x[n]
>> }
>> }
>> assert new Test().getValue(5) == 0
>>
>> where as when I compile static:
>>
>> @CompileStatic
>> class Test {
>> private List<Integer> x = [].withDefault { 0 }
>> Integer getValue(int n) {
>> return x[n]
>> }
>> }
>> assert new Test().getValue(5) == 0
>>
>> I get an assertion failed, because new Test().getValue(5) == null
>>
>> Is this expected behavior or a bug?
>>
>>
>> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen,
>> Søren Berg Glasius
>>
>> Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry, Denmark
>> Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88, Skype: sbglasius
>> --- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes.
>
>
